Legal Opinion

Romeo M. Rasing v. Department of the Navy

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 7, 2006No. 05-3053PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Romeo M. Rasing petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) that dismissed his claim that the Department of the Navy (“Navy” or “agency”) violated his reemployment priority rights after he was separated from the agency in the course of a reduction in force (“RIF”). Rasing v. Dep’t of the Navy, 97 M.S.P.R. 373 (2004) (“Final Decision ”). In an initial decision, the administrative judge (“AJ”) assigned to Mr. Rasing’s ease held that the Board lacked jurisdiction over his claim. Rasing v. Dep’t of the Navy, No.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John F. Roberto v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Howard D. Cowan v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Mary Rose Diefenderfer v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Michael Carley v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Jerry C. Sturdy v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kligman v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Parrish v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API