Legal Opinion
Kligman v. Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 9, 2008No. 07-4042PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Jack Kligman appeals, pro se, from an order of the district court dismissing his appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.
I
The parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history is assumed. To summarize, in 1999 Kligman applied for a position as a seasonal tax examiner with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the 1999-2000 tax season, but was not ultimately selected for appointment. In 2001, having not heard from the IRS, Klig-man inquired about his apparently not being selected for the position. Kligman was advised that…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Raymond G. Lackhouse v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Internal Revenue Service, and Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Donna Carroll v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Kean v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Brock v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011