Legal Opinion
Burlington Insurance v. Fluid Services, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided September 12, 2008No. 2070185Published
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
Fluid Services, Inc., d/b/a Pirtek (“Pir-tek”), purchased a commercial general-liability insurance policy from Burlington Insurance Company. The policy was effective from March 14, 2003, to March 14, 2004. Pirtek paid a $15,000 provisional premium to Burlington. According to the policy, Burlington had the right to examine Pirtek’s books and records and recalculate any premium due based on that audit. Upon the expiration of the policy, Pirtek did not renew its policy with Burlington, having found alternative coverage at a more competitive rate. Burlington audited Pirtek and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.