Legal Opinion

A., T. O. R. R. Co. v. . Morrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, appeal by defendants. The bond declared on in this action was executed by defendant Morrison with the other defendants his sureties, conditioned for the safe keeping and proper disbursement by said Morrison, as treasurer of the plaintiff company, of the money and effects which might come into his hands belonging to the company, and for the performance of his duty as such treasurer in all other respects. A breach of said bond is alleged, in that, the defendant Morrison received a large sum of money, the amount not known, and contrary to the conditions of his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Douglas v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Cox v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Commissioners of Wake v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Preister v. Stanly Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Leak v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API