Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Alm

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBEIDE, J.

This is a suit to foreclose an alleged mechanics’ and materialmen’s lien. We gather from the pleadings, which are lengthy, that about September 20, 1925, W. A. Hattrem and J. R. Hattrem were the owners of lots 19 and 20 in block 33 in Irvington Addition, Portland. That at said date .they contracted with David Aim for the complete construction of a house upon said premises. That Aim sublet a portion of the contract to the plaintiff Johnson, by which Johnson was to furnish the oils, paints and labor for painting said house at an agreed price of $670, and that the said paints, oils and labor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Kezartee v. Marks & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gordon v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Dalles Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Wasco Woolen Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Williams v. Toledo Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Randolph v. ChristensenOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hallmark, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lakeview Drilling Co. v. STARKOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Teeny v. Haertl Constructors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API