Legal Opinion

United States v. Homer

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1976No. Crim. 75-227PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KNOX, District Judge.

The above-named defendant was convicted of three counts of a nine-count indictment by a verdict of a jury after a twelve day trial. The counts on which he was found guilty involved two charges of violation of the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) by extorting money in such a way as to obstruct, delay or affect interstate commerce and one count of a false declaration to a Grand Jury (18 U.S.C. § 1623).

The indictment originally contained nine counts. Count one concerned extortion from Gordon Terminal Services, Inc. Count two covered extortion from Ruthrauff,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. GillockSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Nicholas, ConnieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Mazzella v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  4. State v. BoylesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. United States v. BoylanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API