United States v. Homer
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KNOX, District Judge.
The above-named defendant was convicted of three counts of a nine-count indictment by a verdict of a jury after a twelve day trial. The counts on which he was found guilty involved two charges of violation of the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) by extorting money in such a way as to obstruct, delay or affect interstate commerce and one count of a false declaration to a Grand Jury (18 U.S.C. § 1623).
The indictment originally contained nine counts. Count one concerned extortion from Gordon Terminal Services, Inc. Count two covered extortion from Ruthrauff,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. GillockSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Nicholas, ConnieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Mazzella v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- State v. BoylesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. BoylanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.