Legal Opinion
Colil v. Massachusetts Security Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 28, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.
These cases were tried together. The plaintiffs elected to proceed upon the counts in contract, based on alleged false representations made by an agent of the defendant in selling to them capital stock. The sale to Colil was evidenced by the following agreement:
“ Subscription Agreement
Massachusetts Security Corp.
“ Agreement by and between the Massachusetts Security Corporation incorporated under the laws of Massachusetts, having its home office in Boston, Mass., and Gabriel E. Kamel Colil, 64 Standish Street, Brockton, Mass., hereinafter called the ‘ Subscriber.’
“ Witnesseth: The said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Conner v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
- Bassett v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Morse v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jurewicz v. JurewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Soliman v. Digital Equipment Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Fitch v. IngallsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Zintz v. GolubMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Leary v. Miller (In Re Leary)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.