City of Atlanta v. National Bituminous Coal Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Plaintiff seeks an injunction to restrain and enjoin defendants, the National Bituminous Coal Commission, and its members, from promulgating orders fixing minimum prices for the sale of coal, from enforcing or attempting to enforce any order that may have been promulgated by said Commission, or any other orders affecting the plaintiff in the respects set forth in its complaint, or from instituting or taking any action or proceedings to compel obedience to such orders. It demands that the court adjudge and declare that the National Bituminous Coal Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §…
Also in this document: Dissent · Cardozo; Concurrence · Hughes; Concurrence · Hughes; Dissent · Cardozo.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kansas City Power & Light Company v. Douglas McKay Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Associated Industries of New York State, Inc. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Company v. MortonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973
- Bryan v. Federal Open Market CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1964
- Frahn v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.