Legal Opinion

Merck v. Merck

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 10, 1909No. 7273PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Pickens, March term, 1908. Action by Daniel M. Merck et al. against Lawrence C. Merck et al. Prom judgment for Defendant Mann, plaintiffs appeal. The latter cite: Construction of deed from Blumer Merck to L. C. Merck: 54 S. C., 361; 4 McC., 12, 198; 4 DeS.

Read the full summary

Before Klugh, J., Pickens, March term, 1908. Action by Daniel M. Merck et al. against Lawrence C. Merck et al. Prom judgment for Defendant Mann, plaintiffs appeal. The latter cite: Construction of deed from Blumer Merck to L. C. Merck: 54 S. C., 361; 4 McC., 12, 198; 4 DeS. Eq., 617, 264; 10 Rich., 66; 24 S. C„ 228; 17 N. W. R., 522; 66 S. W. R., 536; 51 Pa., 126; 26 Pac., 450; 66 Ga., 317; 76 N. W., 411; 75 S. W., 677; 53 At., 638; 4 Baxt., 357; 11 Rich., 130; 61 N. W., 673 ; 1 Rich., 165 ; 2 Hilliard, 476. L. C. Merck is estopped from testifying against his deed: 54 S. C., 127; 1 Green Ev.,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr, Justice Woods.

The plaintiffs, as heirs at law of Blumer Merck, brought this action for the partition of a tract of land, containing one hundred and fifty-six acres, alleged in the complaint to have been the property of Blumer Merck at the time of his death. The defendant Lawrence C. Merck is a son of Blumer Merck, and the defendants Ella Burton, B. Stewart and K. Stewart are the children of Parthena Stewart, who predeceased her father, Blumer Merck. W. B. Mann was made a party defendant as the grantee of the interest of Lawrence C. Merck, alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garrett v. WeinbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  3. Hobbs v. BeardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  4. Reeves v. BraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Powers v. RawlsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Glasgow v. GlasgowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Elfriede Eitel v. W. Horace SchmidlappCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. Rembert v. VetoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Watts v. LawrenceWyoming Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API