Legal Opinion
United States v. Thompson
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 3, 1922No. 21-23PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
257 U.S. 419
42 S.Ct. 159
66 L.Ed. 299
THE WESTERN MAID. UNITED STATES
v.
THOMPSON, District Judge, et al. THE LIBERTY. UNITED STATES v. MORTON, District Judge, et al. THE CAROLINIAN. UNITED STATES v. ROSE, District Judge, et al.
Nos. 21-23. Original.
Argued Dec. 12 and 13, 1921.
Decided Jan. 3, 1922.
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 421-423 intentionally omitted]
Mr. T. Catesby Jones, of New York City, for respondents Thompson and others.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 423-426 intentionally omitted]
Mr. E. E. Blodgett, of Boston,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Holmes; Dissent.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jentry v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Multnomah County v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976