Legal Opinion

Southern Bnk. & Trst. Co. v. Harrison Sales Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 28, 1985No. 22240PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial judge sustained Harrison Sales Company’s demurrer to Southern Bank and Trust Company’s complaint. We reverse.

A. E. Pennebaker Company, which is apparently Harrison’s factor, presented a draft drawn on Harrison’s account. Contrary to Harrison’s instructions, Southern paid the draft without Harrison’s approval. Southern brought this declaratory judgment action to determine its rights and obligations arising out of the payment of the draft.

In sustaining the demurrer, the judge held that there was not an actual controversy between the parties. We disagree.

A declaratory judgment action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calvert Fire Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Pee Dee Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Collins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Blue Ridge Electric Cooperative v. Combined Utility SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Waters v. South Carolina Land Resources Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Resources Planning Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. South Carolina Coin Operators Ass'n v. BeasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API