Legal Opinion

Meadows v. Atencio

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided March 4, 2021No. 1:18-cv-00265Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO DAISY MEADOWS, a/k/a ROY TROST, Case No. 1:18-cv-00265-BLW MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiff, AND ORDER v. HENRY ATENCIO et al, Defendant(s). INTRODUCTION Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the remaining Defendants: Eric Blair, Jacob Taylor, Charles Sanders, Chester Martin, Rona Siegert, and Walter Campbell. Dkt. 48. The Court has fully reviewed the record, including the briefs submitted by the parties and has determined that this matter will be decided on the record without oral argument. For the reasons explained…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API