Legal Opinion

Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of Fairfield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1930No. 6 Div. 345PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant sued appellee in the circuit court for the recovery of personal property. A judgment was rendered on verdict for defendant, and appellant was taxed with the costs of the cause. She, a married woman, thereupon has undertaken to appeal upon executing an affidavit as provided in section 6138, without security for costs.

Appellee has moved this court to dismiss the appeal because the judgment is not such as by that statute she may appeal without giving security for costs.

Since this statute has been enacted in its present form, the purpose and effect of the last amendment October, 1915…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kinney v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Burgin v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Ex parte CuddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Peters v. Chas. Schuessler & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Scott v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baker v. Denniston-Boykin Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Walker v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Irwin v. WeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Rogers v. SingletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Pritchett v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API