Legal Opinion

Peters v. Chas. Schuessler & Sons

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 4, 1923No. 5 Div. 840PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Appellees move the court to dismiss the appeal for that (1) no security for costs of the appeal has been given by appellant; that (2) the decree appealed from is not such as is defined by the act of September 22, 1915, from which appeal may be taken by a married woman without giving security for costs of the appeal; (3) that no security for costs or supersedeas bond has been given; and (4) the appeal was not taken within the time required by law.

The provisions of the act of September 22, 1915, exempting married women from giving such security, are; (1) from any judgment, order, or decree of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kimbrell v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Jacobs v. Goodwater Graphite Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Pepper v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. Wright v. KempSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Kimball v. Cunningham Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burgin v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Journequin v. LandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Maya Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Walker v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API