Legal Opinion

(PS) Alston v. LLoyd

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 8, 2021No. 2:18-cv-02420Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, JR., No. 2:18-cv-02420-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Eric Anthony Alston, Jr.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion 19 to Vacate Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b), which the Court 20 construes as a Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Rule 59(e). (ECF No. 80.) Defendants 21 filed an Opposition. (ECF No. 81.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is 22…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Schroeder v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API