Legal Opinion

Pennwalt Corp. v. Centaur Partners

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-5146, 88-9422Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GAWTHROP, District Judge.

At issue is the validity of a solicitation for a shareholders’ meeting, drafted by Centaur Partners and Trio Acquisition Corporation (Centaur) to shareholders of Penn-walt Corporation (Pennwalt). The solicitation states, in pertinent part, that if the person executing it is deemed a member of a “Controlling group” within the meaning of Section 910 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law (PCBL), Pa.Legis. Serv. 160-64 (May, 1988), “this Demand of Meeting shall be null, void, and of no effect.” Pennwalt has filed the instant motions for a temporary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API