Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Clift

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1921No. 23,876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Gibson Circuit Court; S. L. Vandeveer, Judge. Action by John H. Clift against the Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

— This is the second appeal of this case. On the former appeal this court decided' that Acts 1911 p. 454 (§§3920b-3920h Burns 1914), was not in contravention' of the Constitution of the United States, at least so far as the initial carrier was concerned, and that the third paragraph of the complaint stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. And the cause was remanded to the trial court with a mandate which amounted to an express direction to overrule appellant’s demurrer for alleged want of facts to said paragraph. Clift v. Southern R. Co. (1919), 188 Ind. 472, 124 N. E. 457.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. BlindIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Clift v. Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Postlewaite, Treasurer v. HasseIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FriendIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API