Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Friend

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1924No. 23,877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.

In a former appeal of this case, the complaint was held sufficient. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Friend (1918), 70 Ind. App. 366, 118 N. E. 598. It alleged, among other things, that on April 26, 1913, a menagerie and circus had exhibited at Marion, Indiana, and, in the evening, large crowds of people returned on defendant’s (appellant’s) train from Marion to their homes at Amboy and other way stations along defendant’s line of railroad west of Marion; that additional coaches, in excess of the number ordinarily attached to the train, had been added to it to accommodate the crowds; that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. McFarrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. BlindIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. George B. Limbert & Co. v. WaznitskyIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. CliftIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FriendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. KuhlenschmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Catherwood v. Morgan, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API