Commonwealth v. Paul

Rhodes, J.,

Opinion by

Appellants, Gomer Paul and Peter Paul, were each charged with conspiracy, inciting to riot, and riot. They were tried together. At .the conclusion of the Commonwealth’s case their demurrers were sustained to the charges of inciting to riot and conspiracy. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of riot against both appellants. Appellants’ motions in arrest of judgment and for new trial were overruled, and sentences were imposed.

On these appeals the sole question raised is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the convictions. The two assignments of error relate to the…