Legal Opinion

United States v. Flinn

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 16, 2007No. CR. S-05-314 GEB (GGH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Introduction and Summary

In a superseding indictment filed February 2, 2006, defendant Jeremy Flinn was charged with receiving, and possession of, child pornography. 18 U.S.C. § § 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(4)(B). By his discovery motion, Flinn seeks to have his expert examine a mirror image of Flinn’s seized hard drive and thumb drive at his defense expert’s facilities.

On July 27, 2006, the Adam Walsh Act took effect. One of its provisions codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3509(m) required that the Government or the court maintain control during the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. KnellingerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  2. United States v. O'RourkeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
  3. United States v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. DoaneDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2007
  5. United States v. SturmDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PoulinDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
  2. State v. DingmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. DingmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. GRENNINGWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API