Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Gannon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 2016No. 13AB0325; A156763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Respondent appeals a supplemental judgment denying him attorney fees and costs, arguing that the trial court was wrong to conclude that ORS 107.716(3)1 does not provide a statutory basis to award fees and costs. The issue here is whether the trial court “held a hearing pursuant to [ORS 107.718(10)]” when, at the time set for a hearing requested by respondent under that statute to contest an ex parte restraining order, petitioner sought and was granted voluntary dismissal of the restraining order. The trial court concluded that because there was no “contested hearing” at which the court made a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. Sedwick CMS (A180289)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. CraigenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Hibbs v. Sedwick CMS (A180289)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API