Walsh's Adm'x v. Joplin & P. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
At. Law. Actions by Walsh’s administratrix and by one Theolete against the Joplin & Pittsburg Railway Company. On motion to re-tax costs after a remand to the state court.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, District Judge.
These cases were commenced in the district court of Crawford county, Kan. The defendant brought them to this court upon petition for removal. Upon appropriate motions they were remanded to the state court at defendant’s costs, but no order was made at the time with reference to the amount of such costs, or with reference to attorney’s docket fee. Plaintiffs have filed motions to retax the costs, contending that an attorney’s fee should be taxed against the removing defendant in each case. It is particularly desired that a rule should be made establishing the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Josslyn v. PhillipsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1886
- Pellett v. Great Northern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1900
- Riser v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1902
- Acker v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kramer v. JarvisDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
- Jones v. Delta Land & Water Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1918
- Karsohles v. MoschosDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1954