Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Jarvis
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided September 26, 1949No. Civ. No. 54-48PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
The defendant moves for the retaxation of costs by the elimination from the costs taxed by the clerk of the item of $20 as an attorney’s docket fee. After the remanding on December 21, 194$, of the action to the state court on the ground that it was not brought here in a valid or proper manner, Kramer v. Jarvis, D.C.Neb., 81 F. Supp. 360, the clerk, on her own motion, taxed the docket fee in the course of her general taxation of costs. The motion followed. It is well taken and should be and is being sustained. However, let it be understood at the outset that the order…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Insurance Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Marks v. Leo Feist, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dan Smoot v. Honorable Noel P. Fox, United States District Judge for the Western Districtof MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Davis v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
- Karsohles v. MoschosDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1954
- Reynolds v. WadeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
- Breslerman v. American Liberty InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1959