Legal Opinion

Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co. v. Weinberg

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1927No. 4481PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is brought by respondent against appellants to recover the value of an apple crop purchased by appellants from one W.A. Claudin, October 15, 1921. In order to secure a promissory note for $1,478.74 and interest, on February 2, 1921, Claudin and wife executed and delivered their chattel mortgage to respondent bank upon the following "chattels located in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, to-wit: All cropsgrown during the season of 1921 of whatsoever nature, butestimated to consist of approximately 12 acres of alfalfa, 3acres of potatoes, and one acre of onions. Said crops to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Isbell v. SletteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. McMaster v. EmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Simmons v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Pierce v. LangdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Forbush v. San Diego Fruit & Produce Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Devereaux Mortgage Co. v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hammons v. FranzblauMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Adair v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Bodenhamer v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API