Legal Opinion

BRANNIAN v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 29, 2005No. 02CV1726BTMWMCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.

On May 5, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on their claims for declaratory and injunctive relief and nominal damages. Pursuant to the Court’s request, Defendants waited to file their cross motion for summary judgment until January 28, 2005. For the reasons expressed below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.

I. Background

On August 29, 2002, Plaintiffs filed this action against the Municipal Employees…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carbonell v. Lopez FigueroaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API