BRANNIAN v. City of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
On May 5, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on their claims for declaratory and injunctive relief and nominal damages. Pursuant to the Court’s request, Defendants waited to file their cross motion for summary judgment until January 28, 2005. For the reasons expressed below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.
I. Background
On August 29, 2002, Plaintiffs filed this action against the Municipal Employees…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carbonell v. Lopez FigueroaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024