Legal Opinion
In re: D.D.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 21, 2022No. 27/21PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In re: D.D., No. 27, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Biran, J. FOURTH AMENDMENT – SEARCHES AND SEIZURES – INVESTIGATORY DETENTIONS – REASONABLE SUSPICION BASED ON THE ODOR OF MARIJUANA – D.D., a juvenile, and his four companions were detained by police officers after the officers smelled the odor of marijuana coming from the group. While frisking D.D. for weapons, one of the officers discovered a loaded gun in D.D.’s waistband. After being charged with firearms offenses, D.D. moved to suppress the gun. The Court of Appeals held that the odor of marijuana gives rise to reasonable suspicion…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- 107 OAG 153 (FINAL), Maryland Attorney General Reports2022
- Cutchember v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Cutchember v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.