Legal Opinion

Southerland v. Potts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1951No. 237PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

We deem it unnecessary to discuss the legal effect of the deed from John Kornegay to Bryant Southerland and his wife, Martha C. Southerland, since regardless of its provisions, Martha C. Southerland became vested with a fee simple title thereto, subject only, in any event, to the life estates conveyed in the above deed, by virtue of the allotment to her of the identical lands described in the deed in the division of her father’s estate.

The defendant contends, however, that the commissioners in the special proceeding to divide the lands of John Kornegay, deceased, did not allot the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Carter v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Bank v. . LeveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Buchanan v. . HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Pinnell v. BurroughsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLamb v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Ijames v. SwaimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API