Legal Opinion
Loyola Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fickling
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided January 29, 1992No. Civ. A. 89-110-2-MAC(DF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, District Judge.
Pending before the court are a series of motions in this complex case. In a consent order issued on March 20, 1991, defendant/third-party plaintiff William A. Fick-ling, Jr., (“Fickling”) dismissed with prejudice his claims against third-party defendants Steven S. Friedman and Steven R. Gretenstein, removing them from this case and mooting their motion for summary judgment. Presently pending are motions by Loyola Federal Savings & Loan Association (“Loyola”) for summary judgment on its contract claim and on Fickling’s counterclaims, by Fickling for partial summary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Player v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Loyola Federal Savings Bank v. FicklingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Loyola Federal Savings Bank v. FicklingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- MACK v. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINES INCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2023