Metropolitan Discount Co. v. Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from' District Court, Cotton County ; Cham. Jones, Judge. Action by the Metropolitan Discount Company against F. D. Davis. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEWART, C.
This case involves liability of the defendant to the p’aintiff on five negotiable bills of acceptance each for $59.20 and bearing date, January 20, 1914, payable to the order of National Novelty Import Company, due re- speetively 4 months, 6- months, 8 months, 10 months, and 12 months after date. The plaintiff corporation alleged that it was the owner and holder of such bills in due course for valuable consideration and by due in-dorsement before maturity; that the defendant had paid on the first due the sum of $25 on July 2, 1914, and the further sum of $25 on July 21,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herrick v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Deep River National Bank's Appeal From CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Cadillac State Bank v. Cadillac Stave & Heading Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leahy v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- McDonald v. MulkeyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Allenberg v. Rapken Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1930