Legal Opinion

Barto v. Detroit Iron & Steel Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1910No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Searl, J., presiding. Case by Carlo Barto, as administrator of tbe estate of Francis Kopovics, deceased, against tbe Detroit Iron & Steel Company. Judgment for plaintiff; defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

In February, 1905, a part of the business of defendant was casting iron. For this purpose a building some 200 feet in length and from 60 to 80 feet wide was used. In one end of the building was a furnace. In the other, but at some distance from the wall of the room, was an elevated platform, upon which the pig breaker was placed, and from which a traveling crane was operated. Underneath the platform were the rails of a track running in through a door from outside of the building; the floor of the casting room being higher than the level of the ground outside the building and higher *136than the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barto v. Detroit Iron & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pecard v. Menominee Riyer Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jodoin v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API