Legal Opinion

Pecard v. Menominee Riyer Sugar Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1908No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Menominee; Stone, J. Case by Adolph' Pecard against the Menominee River Sugar Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The defendant was engaged in the business of manufacturing sugar from sugar beets. On its premises was situated a beet shed into which were run railway tracks upon which loaded cars were taken in and the beets unloaded, and the testimony shows that as occasion required, the empty cars were taken out by the switch engine, or if the switch engine was not at hand, the cars were pushed out by the men employed in unloading beets. The plaintiff was employed by the defendant to engage in the work of unloading beets on the 16th day of October, 1906. He commenced work at about 1 o’clock on that day,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gavigan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Polaski v. Pittsburgh Coal Dock Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Barto v. Detroit Iron & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API