Legal Opinion

Kusmark v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1967No. Civ. 29166PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

This action was brought to obtain a judicial interpretation of a lease by which plaintiffs, as landlord, leased real property to defendant, as tenant, for a term of 30 years commencing June 1, 1946. Plaintiffs’ contention is that defendant is obligated to raze the existing building and erect a new building on the premises suitable for its mercantile business. After a court trial in which extrinsic evidence was received, the court gave its judgment declaring that defendant was not obligated to build. Plaintiffs are appealing from that judgment.

The scope of appellate review in this kind of ease…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Teachers of Oakland v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Hollister Co. v. Cal-L Exploration Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. In Re Air Passenger Comp. Res. Sys. Antitrust Lit.District Court, C.D. California · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API