Legal Opinion

Quiland, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 22, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] This matter is before us on appeal by Quiland, Inc., from an order of the Public Utilities Commission that: (1) upheld an individual metering requirement *698applied to Quiland’s seasonal home development by the Kennebunk, Kennebunk-port, and Wells Water District (the District); and (2) ordered the District to modify the methodology by which it calculates and assesses its System Development Charge (SDC), 35-A M.R.S. § 6107 (2006), as applied to Quiland “so that the charge more accurately reflects the expected usage characteristics of its customers.” A proceeding addressing that modification…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Town of RockportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Christian Fellowship & Renewal Center v. Town of LimingtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. Quiland, Inc. v. Wells Sanitary DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. E. Perry Iron & Metal Co., Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quiland, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. General Marine Construction Corporation v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API