Legal Opinion
Hirschel v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arnold Guy Fraiman, J.
Motions Nos. 89 and 90 of October 21, 1982 are consolidated for disposition. Plaintiffs in this action for a declaratory judgment are landlords of buildings in the City of New York subject to rent control or the rent stabilization laws. Defendants are the City and State of New York and a number of tenants, in buildings owned by plaintiffs, who are senior citizens to whom rent increase exemption orders have been issued by the city under the provisions of the New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Law (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Y51-1.0…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Monteferrante v. New York City Fire DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Monteferrante v. New York City Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Parrino v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- 903 Park Avenue Corp. v. City Rent AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Shapiro v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kraebel v. New York City Department Of Housing Preservation And DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Kraebel v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992