Pitkin v. Peet
Supreme Court of Iowa
■Appeal from Jones District Court.— Hon. James D. Gieeen, Judge. Action in equity for the Interpretation of a will and an ante-nuptial contract. The district court rendered a decree from which appeals were taken by all of the parties to the action.
Read the full summary
■Appeal from Jones District Court.— Hon. James D. Gieeen, Judge. Action in equity for the Interpretation of a will and an ante-nuptial contract. The district court rendered a decree from which appeals were taken by all of the parties to the action. The result is shown in the final opinion reported in 87 Iowa, 286 (54 N. W. Rep. 215). A procedendo having been issued, directing the district court to proceed in accordance with the opinion, a decree was rendered from which William G. Peet, as an individual, and as executor of the state of James M. Peet, deceased, appeals.—
1Opinion of the Court
Robinson J.
1 The appellee asks that the abstract be stricken from the files, -on the ground that it does not show the name of the judge who presided on the trial in the district court. Section 117 of the rules of this court, adopted December 16, 1886, requires that the 'abstract in each case appealed to this court “be so prepared as to show the name of the judge who presided at the trial.” Under this rule, it is the customary and approved’ practice to print the name of the trial judge on the first page of the abstract, immediately following the statement in regard to the court from which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Austin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- City Bank v. RadtkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Kissinger v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Van Ormer v. HarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Pitkin v. PeetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Miller v. RosebrookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Pitkin v. PeetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.