Legal Opinion

Smith v. Orthopedics International, Ltd.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2010No. 83038-0PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

¶1 —This case presents the following questions: (1) whether counsel for defendants in a personal injury action engaged in prohibited ex parte contact with a nonparty treating physician fact witness, per our decision in Loudon v. Mhyre, 110 Wn.2d 675, 756 P.2d 138 (1988), by sending documents to the physician’s counsel prior to the physician’s testimony at trial and (2) if that conduct is proscribed by Loudon, is the grant of a new trial the proper remedy for the violation? Although we conclude that the defendants’ attorney violated the Loudon prohibition on ex parte contact, we hold that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Carson v. FineWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State of Washington v. Dallin David FortCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Youngs v. PeaceHealthWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Lee v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. Hermanson v. Multicare Health Sys., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API