Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. L. G. Morrow & Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by George E. Moore from Stacy, J., at March Term, 1917, of Pitt.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
This action is to recover $175, purchase price of an adding machine, the contract to purchase being signed by “L. G. Morrow & Co., by L. G. Morrow, Manager.” L. G. Morrow and G. E. Moore were partners in the firm of Morrow & Moore, which was dissolved 12 June, 1914. Thereafter, on 20 June, 1914, L. G. Morrow and G. E. Moore entered into articles of agreement, reciting that L. G. Morow and G. E. Moore had dissolved their partnership, and without repudiating that dissolution in any way, and agreeing that the firm of L. G. Morrow & Co. should be liable for certain contracts therein specified,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. . CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Lipinsky v. . RevellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Norfleet v. Pamlico Insurance & Banking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Kootz v. . TuvianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- A. L. Webb & Sons v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eggleston v. . EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Bolch v. . ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Blackstone Guano Co. v. BallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Martin v. . BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Martin v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.