Legal Opinion

Lipinsky v. . Revell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by defendant and ber husband from Connor, J., at April Term, 1914, of BuNcombe. Tbis is a civil action. From a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff against tbe feme defendant, Caroline, sbe and ber husband, O. D. Revell, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Tbis is an action to recover of the feme defendant $247.30 for merchandise sold and delivered to her. On the trial the plaintiff introduced verified account in evidence under Eevisal, sec. 1625. "We think the verification in due form and sufficient to make out a prima facie case. Knight v. Taylor, 131 N. C., 84.

The feme defendant in her answer denies that she is indebted to the plaintiff, admits the receipt of some of the goods charged against her, and admits that she has paid no part of said account, and avers that the goods so purchased by herself from the plaintiff were for necessaries,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farthing v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Knight v. Taylor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Berry v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Warren v. . DailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Shore v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Tise v. . Hicks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API