Legal Opinion

Moller v. Moller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 30, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant moves to strike the answer and counter-claim of the defendant, her husband, filed to her bill against him founded on a separation agreement.

The parties had separated before 1928 when they entered into the agreement. Thereby they each consented that they should continue to live separate and apart, and the husband agreed to pay to his wife $50 weekly, until her death or remarriage, in full satisfaction of all claims for maintenance and support. Defendant has so fallen behind in the promised payments, that the arrears now amount to $7,800. Complainant sues for the arrears.

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Goerke Kirch Co. v. Goerke Kirch Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Apfelbaum v. ApfelbaumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  3. Dennison v. DennisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Cohen v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  5. Second Nat. Bank of Paterson v. CurieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schiff v. SchiffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Dumel v. DumelCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
  4. Polyckronos v. PolyckronosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  5. Dumel v. DumelCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API