Dumel v. Dumel

Seitz, Chancellor:

Plaintiff (wife) has moved for summary judgment in an action for specific performance of the provision for her support in the separation agreement executed by the parties before their divorce. Defendant’s first defense is that the support *466provision (being Paragraph 12 of the Agreement) is ambiguous and requires interpretation. He says that this calls for testimony which means that plaintiff’s motion must be denied. Plaintiff says the language is so clear that its plain meaning could not be altered by testimony.

Paragraph 12 provides:

“Husband agrees to pay Two Hundred Sixty…