Legal Opinion
Narce v. Mervilus
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 30, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2023-0200Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAGALE NARCE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-200 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell HARDY MERVILUS et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Magale Narce initiated this ten-count action against three Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) officers, Hardy Mervilus, John Dobbins, and Christopher Christian (jointly, “Officer Defendants”), and the District of Columbia, alleging that the Officer Defendants stopped, searched, and arrested him without probable cause, in violation of the Fourth Amendment and D.C. common law. See Am. Compl.,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.