Legal Opinion

Banks v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 9, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00151Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION SHERRY A. BANKS, Case No. 1:18-cv-151 Plaintiff, Litkovitz, M.J. vs. COMMISSIONER OF ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) (Doc. 29), the Commissioner’s opposing memorandum (Doc. 30), and plaintiff’s reply in support of the motion (Doc. 31). Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), a court may award a prevailing claimant’s attorney a reasonable fee not in excess of 25 percent of past-due benefits recovered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Edna L. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Patrick Lasley v. Comm'r of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. Joseph J. ROYZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API