Legal Opinion

State v. Berkwit

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1985No. 49478PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

The state appeals a trial court order sustaining defendant’s motion to quash a search warrant and further ordering the evidence seized in the execution of that warrant suppressed. § 547.200 RSMo Supp.1984. Defendant-respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal for the reasons discussed in this court’s opinion in State v. Holzschuh, 670 S.W.2d 184 (Mo.App.1984), i.e. that the state may not appeal mid-trial rulings.

We reaffirm the conclusion that § 547.200 RSMo Supp.1984 “was not meant to provide the state the right to appeal a mid-trial evidentiary ruling.” Holzschuh, 670 S.W.2d at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. State v. HessCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  4. State v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API