State v. Hess
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.
¶ 1. Wisconsin adopted a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule in State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶ 74, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625. When people close to the criminal law discuss this exception, they speak of a scenario where law enforcement officers seek to do something, get judicial approval to do it (a warrant), and act in good faith reliance on that judicial approval. In that scenario, the good faith exception provides that law enforcement's reliance will not come back to haunt them if there was a procedural error. Generally this means that courts will admit evidence even if the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. EasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Steven HortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- State v. HessWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- State v. DumsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- State v. HessWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.