Legal Opinion

Heavens v. King County Rural Library District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1965No. 37395Published

1DissentFinley, J.

(dissenting) — The decision arrived at by the majority herein is not inevitably directed or absolutely required either by provisions of the state constitution or the constitution of the United States. Viewed realistically, *567the decision involves a policy judgment, or a matter of judgment as to values.

The issue in this case is cléar cut: If utilized for the establishment of a library, where does the local improvement district concept, device or mechanism fall on the legal spectrum of permissible and nonpermissible special assessments? The early case of Wilson v. Lambert, 168 U.S. 611, 42 L. Ed.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wilson v. LambertSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Thomson v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API