Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barland v. Eau Claire County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1998No. 96-1607Published

1DissentJanine P. Geske, J.

¶ 64. 0dissenting). I dissent. The majority opinion errs in two important respects. First, the majority mistakenly concludes that the power to bump a circuit court employee, despite the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, is an exclusive power of the circuit court and not a power shared with the legislative branch. Second, the majority purports to state a narrow rule, but the true impact of this rule will be hard to contain.

¶ 65. Based upon the Wisconsin Constitution and our constitutional case law interpreting shared powers, I would conclude that a circuit court shares power with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Constitutionality of Chapter 315, Laws of 1943Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Friedrich v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API