Legal Opinion
Aetna Securities Co. v. Sickels
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 28, 1949No. 17,891PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Crumpacker, J.
— Considering the questions involved to be of sufficient importance, the two divisions of this court sat in banc for the consideration and decision of this appeal. Burns’ 1946 Replacement, § 4-202. One judge did not participate in the decision. Three judges joined in the majority opinion and two dissented. The appellant contends that under these circumstances the transfer of this appeal to the Supreme Court for decision is mandatory.
The statute upon which the appellant relies in support of his position is Burns’ 1946 Replacement, § 4-209, which reads as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. Gary Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Lake Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- De Haven v. Municipal City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Sickels v. Aetna Securities Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Lesh v. Johnston Furniture Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Cox v. PruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aetna Securities Co. v. SickelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949