Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 23, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal firom Wright Oirouit Court. Action at law. Trial by jury. Judgment for plaintiff, and both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

The plaintiff is an attorney at law, and as such commenced an action for one Gunnerson against the defendant to recover damages sustained by Gunnerson by reason of a personal injury caused by the negligence of the defendant. At the time the action was commenced, the plaintiff served a notice on the defendant that he claimed an attorney’s lien for $7,000. After the service of such notice the defendant settled with Gunnerson, and this action is brought to recover a reasonable compensation for the services of the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded that the contract between the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boardman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Adye v. HannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. Eaton & EstesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Galt v. ProvanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Wallace v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Barthell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Cutchall v. CutchallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API