Legal Opinion
Van Pilsum v. Iowa State University of Science & Technology
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided September 12, 1994No. Civ. 4-92-70619PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, AND ORDERS DISMISSING CLAIMS BARRED BY THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT
VIETOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joyce Van Pilsum brings suit against defendants Iowa State University of Science and Technology (I.S.U.); the State of Iowa; the Iowa State Board of Regents; and Barbara Mack, Martin C. Jischke, and Frank Brown, all officials at I.S.U. After this court’s ruling on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, plaintiff has two remaining claims: (1) an age discrimination claim brought under both the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Iowa Code 601A…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Les Hadley v. North Arkansas Community Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Brine v. University Of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.