Legal Opinion
Chrisman v. Cornell University
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 27, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
See, also, 132 N.J. Eq. 178, 27 A.2d 627. The plaintiffs, trustees under the last will and testament of Francis Leon Chrisman, filed a petition for advice respecting the division of the residuary estate of the decedent, and the defendants join in the prayer.
The pertinent clause of the will provides:
"6 — (d) I direct my said trustees, after setting aside the fund provided in the preceding clause of this will, to invest the remainder of my residuary estate and to keep the same invested in good and lawful securities, and pay over the net income arising therefrom to my wife, Carrie L. Chrisman,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Swetland v. SwetlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Barrett v. BarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Swetland v. SwetlandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- March v. Norristown Penn Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Dusenberry v. JohnsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Estate of CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- In Re Estate of FloodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010